If you have evidence in a disagreement but your classmate does not want to see it, what should you recommend?

Prepare for the JROTC Leadership and Academic Bowl (JLAB) Leadership Test. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Ready yourself for the challenge!

Using an arbitrator to resolve the dispute is a constructive approach when one party is unwilling to consider evidence. An arbitrator, a neutral third party, can facilitate the discussion and ensure that both viewpoints are heard, helping to bring resolution to the disagreement. This method promotes fairness and an objective evaluation of the situation, allowing for a more informed decision-making process without escalating the conflict.

In contrast, continuing to argue your point without considering your classmate's perspective is unlikely to be productive and may further entrench both parties in their positions. Ignoring your evidence diminishes the value of your perspective and does not contribute to a resolution. Similarly, compromising your stance without any justification may lead to resentment or an unsatisfactory outcome, as it doesn't address the root of the disagreement or allow for a balanced solution. Using an arbitrator thus offers a balanced and effective method of conflict resolution that respects both perspectives while aiming for a fair conclusion.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy