What should mediators do if "at least one of the parties" cannot agree on a solution?

In mediation, the goal is to reach a consensus that is agreeable to all parties involved. If "at least one of the parties" cannot agree on a solution, it signifies that there is not yet a common ground that satisfies everyone. In this context, replacing "at least one" with "both" for agreement criteria effectively reinforces the fundamental principle that a successful mediation requires the agreement of all parties. This approach prompts the mediator to ensure that the needs and concerns of both sides are addressed adequately before finalizing any solutions, therefore enhancing the likelihood of a mutually satisfactory resolution.

This ensures that mediation does not force one party to concede or accept a solution that they are uncomfortable with, which could lead to unresolved issues and resentment. Instead, by focusing on the need for both parties to agree, mediators can facilitate further discussion and exploration of alternatives that may be acceptable to everyone involved, thereby promoting a collaborative atmosphere.